Cet article vous est offert par Fidelity International.

Fidelity - An express dialogue: ESG engagement in China

""

Covid-19 lockdowns contributed to higher e-commerce volumes globally, and this played out on a grand scale in China. The country’s leading delivery firm, ZTO Express, saw shipments surge 40 per cent last year, similar to growth seen in markets like the UK and the US. Yet the volumes were astonishing: ZTO delivered around 47 million parcels a day - more than volumes of FedEx, DHL and UPS combined.



Manufacturing and moving all those boxes, envelopes and packages adds up to a staggering amount of fuel emissions, and paper and plastic consumption, an obvious area of concern to investors focused on sustainability. But the sector is also grappling with a price war driven by fierce competition, which has been pressuring many Chinese delivery companies to cut corners.



Against this backdrop, Fidelity’s investment team has been engaging in a running dialogue with ZTO’s management over the past two years that has contributed to the company’s embrace of more comprehensive standards of disclosure around the environmental, social and governance (ESG) impact of its rapidly expanding operations. One direct result of this engagement is that the company has become China’s first express delivery firm to publish regular standalone sustainability reports, and to make the pioneering move of linking executive compensation to sustainable performance. Amplifying the impact, others in the industry have taken notice of ZTO’s sustainability push and are starting to follow suit. 

 

 



“When the market leaders set a precedence of using biodegradable boxes or fuel-efficient trucks, that will drive other players in a competitive industry,” said Fidelity International equity analyst Terence Tsai. “We feel we can engage the entire industry by getting a market leader to make the first move.”

 

Early-mover advantage

In early 2019, Tsai first reached out to ZTO executives to discuss an unfavorable ESG report written by a third-party rating agency. A lack of sustainability disclosures was partially to blame for the poor rating that ZTO had received. Going through the report line by line, Tsai explained global ESG standards to company officials while stressing the importance of regular and quality disclosures.



The company’s response surprised even Tsai, who said he had kept his expectations modest in early engagement efforts, given how competitive China’s express shipping sector had become. A worsening price war has threatened the financial health and even viability of some smaller competitors, although ZTO has managed to stay profitable. While the company widened its market share to about 20 per cent last year amid booming e-commerce volumes, gross margin slumped to 22.5 per cent from the 29.2 per cent reached in 2019.



“When you are fighting to survive in the industry, you would think ESG is probably put on the backburner versus priorities like market share and profitability,” Tsai said. “I was very surprised and encouraged to see the market leader taking a serious ESG approach.”

Founding chairman Lai Meisong, a carpenter-turned billionaire, later showed us over the course of many meetings that he has the long-term vision needed for pursuing high ESG standards, even in a challenging business environment.

Steady progress

In late 2019, ZTO published its first ESG report, setting a good example for the young industry. Competitors SF Holding and Best soon followed suit. Moreover, ZTO’s board passed a motion last year to integrate more sustainable practices into daily operations and to reflect them in senior management compensation, in line with our advice.



Environmentally, a key improvement made by ZTO in the last two years was the reduction of paper documentation. Fidelity advised the company on this, and the change was also driven by another ZTO investor Cainiao, the logistics arm of e-commerce giant Alibaba, sharing industry best practice. By introducing e-waybills and smaller sheets of paper for the printed documents, ZTO has reduced paper consumption per package by 70 per cent, saving some 50,000 tons of paper each year. That is equivalent to saving 850,000 trees or 500,000 tons of carbon emissions. In addition, it has started to recycle packaging materials and experiment with new-energy vehicles. A fleet of more than 7,000 high capacity trucks have replaced less efficient vehicles, each saving two litres of fuel per 100 km and reducing 15 tons of carbon emissions a year.

Profit sharing

When it comes to social and governance issues, ZTO also stands out from competitors for its well-aligned interest among stakeholders. Like most peers, including STO Express, YTO Express and Yunda Holding, the company relies on franchisees to keep up with the fast pace of China’s e-commerce growth, though SF Holding has been an exception with a direct-control model. Franchisees often handle the pickup and last-mile delivery, while companies like ZTO operate a network of sorting hubs which are more scalable. What sets ZTO apart from competitors is that it has turned many of its franchisees into shareholders and thereby minimised disputes over profit sharing. Having shareholder franchisees allows the company greater control over the well-being of drivers and riders. This model is likely to have helped the company avoid labour disruptions last year when some rivals suffered strikes over wage arrears at the franchisee level.



The industry in general is prone to work accidents due to a strong emphasis on speed and a huge number of temporary workers, who are often hired to cope with seasonal spikes in orders around key retail dates like November 11. On the world’s biggest retail ‘holiday’, known as double 11 or Singles Day in China, the country’s e-commerce giants tallied nearly one trillion renminbi ($152 billion) in combined sales last year. Nevertheless, ZTO took measures to minimise work hazards among both temporary and long-term staff, including thousands of hours of training, in line with Fidelity’s advice.

Home of delivery giants

Chairman Lai founded the company in early 2000s in the eastern China county of Tonglu, the home of no fewer than four modern express shipping giants that together control more than half of the market today. Contrary to some presumptions about family operations being focused only on the near term, Lai says he is building a business empire beyond his own generation, aspiring for not only market dominance within China, but also global leadership, emulating firms like FedEx and UPS

To be sure, the progress we have seen in ZTO’s sustainable push represents only a small step forward for the industry. For most Chinese delivery firms, the top line and the bottom line remain prime focuses as they face tough competition and low awareness of sustainability in the general public. They have a lot of catching up to do compared with global industry leaders like FedEx, which has set a 2040 target of carbon neutrality, and DHL, which is working towards zero emissions by 2050.



With 83 billion express parcels swirling around China last year, the country’s delivery market has become a key battleground for achieving global carbon neutrality in the next few decades. Bringing sustainability here will mean broader benefits for society that extend beyond just the financial rewards, and ZTO looks to have helped set off a positive chain reaction towards that goal.

 

Learn more on www.fidelity.be.

 

 

Important Information

This document is for Investment Professionals only and should not be relied on by private investors.

This document is provided for information purposes only and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is sent. It must not be reproduced or circulated to any other party without prior permission of Fidelity.

This document does not constitute a distribution, an offer or solicitation to engage the investment management services of Fidelity, or an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or offer is not authorised or would be contrary to local laws or regulations. Fidelity makes no representations that the contents are appropriate for use in all locations or that the transactions or services discussed are available or appropriate for sale or use in all jurisdictions or countries or by all investors or counterparties.

This communication is not directed at, and must not be acted on by persons inside the United States and is otherwise only directed at persons residing in jurisdictions where the relevant funds are authorised for distribution or where no such authorisation is required. Fidelity is not authorised to manage or distribute investment funds or products in, or to provide investment management or advisory services to persons resident in, mainland China. All persons and entities accessing the information do so on their own initiative and are responsible for compliance with applicable local laws and regulations and should consult their professional advisers.

Reference in this document to specific securities should not be interpreted as a recommendation to buy or sell these securities, but is included for the purposes of illustration only. Investors should also note that the views expressed may no longer be current and may have already been acted upon by Fidelity. The research and analysis used in this documentation is gathered by Fidelity for its use as an investment manager and may have already been acted upon for its own purposes. This material was created by Fidelity International.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

This document may contain materials from third-parties which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with any Fidelity entity (Third-Party Content). Fidelity has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content.

Fidelity International refers to the group of companies which form the global investment management organization that provides products and services in designated jurisdictions outside of North America Fidelity, Fidelity International, the Fidelity International logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited. Fidelity only offers information on products and services and does not provide investment advice based on individual circumstances.

Issued in Europe: Issued by FIL Investments International (FCA registered number 122170) a firm authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FIL (Luxembourg) S.A., authorised and supervised by the CSSF (Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier) and FIL Investment Switzerland AG. For German wholesale clients issued by FIL Investment Services GmbH, Kastanienhöhe 1, 61476 Kronberg im Taunus. For German Institutional clients issued by FIL (Luxembourg) S.A., 2a, rue Albert Borschette BP 2174 L-1021 Luxembourg.

In Hong Kong, this document is issued by FIL Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited and it has not been reviewed by the Securities and Future Commission. FIL Investment Management (Singapore) Limited (Co. Reg. No: 199006300E) is the legal representative of Fidelity International in Singapore. FIL Asset Management (Korea) Limited is the legal representative of Fidelity International in Korea. In Taiwan, Independently operated by FIL Securities (Taiwan ) Limited, 11F, 68 Zhongxiao East Road., Section 5, Xinyi Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan 11065, R.O.C Customer Service Number: 0800-00-9911#2 .

Issued in Australia by Fidelity Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL No. 409340 (“Fidelity Australia”). This material has not been prepared specifically for Australian investors and may contain information which is not prepared in accordance with Australian law.

ED21 - 064